|
Post by Yuliya on May 13, 2004 8:48:29 GMT -5
Okay, let me see if I got this right...they gave him a horse because he's Caucasian? You don't want to drive AM in Caucasus mountains; French Riviera it's not. However, CG, where did you get that piece of information? Or even that word?
|
|
|
Post by curious george on May 13, 2004 9:38:25 GMT -5
equestrian --> horse I'm assuming that his race is Caucasian whether he's in Hollywood or not. It was a joke.cg
|
|
|
Post by Yuliya on May 13, 2004 10:11:02 GMT -5
Methinks somebody took that "received" thing a tad too seriously. Not really; Caucasian is an American term, I believe. That's because it's not PC to say "white" anymore. A short trip to Caucasus might shatter somebody's ideas of what a Caucasian person might look like. Really? ;D
|
|
|
Post by curious george on May 13, 2004 12:04:59 GMT -5
Methinks somebody took that "received" thing a tad too seriously. ;D ;D ;D In order: very possible. Certainly true. Very likely. ;D cg
|
|
|
Post by Ace on May 17, 2004 17:25:11 GMT -5
PB at the races in Mexico City during a few hours off. (May 10th) When he joked at the LOA press conference that he was just going to munch ice for 8 weeks and be thin and enigmatic he evidently wasn't kidding. In each photo he's thinner than the last. Must be heck on continuity. Ace
|
|
|
Post by sparklingblue on May 19, 2004 17:16:23 GMT -5
He should really have his personal cook!
|
|
|
Post by Ace on May 26, 2004 19:06:14 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by sparklingblue on May 27, 2004 10:53:41 GMT -5
Aww! How very cute!
|
|
|
Post by sparklingblue on May 31, 2004 12:07:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by curious george on May 31, 2004 14:07:13 GMT -5
My guess is they have not very nice things to say about Keely, considering the differences in her appearance. But doesn't she look stunning in that red dress?
I have to say, that first picture made me think of early royal family pictures of the boys with Charles and Diana. (That's not meant to be a comparison, positive or negative - it's just what crossed my mind when I saw it.)
cg
|
|
|
Post by Ace on May 31, 2004 14:21:44 GMT -5
My question, the family photo of them just going for a walk... it's completely head on. So do the paparrazzi just plant themselves in the middle of the sidewalk and snap away that close or do they use telephoto lenses and wait for crowds to get out of the line... and don't these people ever just feel creepy about what they do for a living? Of course all that said my first reaction was ooh pretty Pierce hair, I miss it! Ace
|
|
|
Post by curious george on May 31, 2004 14:24:42 GMT -5
I've wondered the same kind of thing myself. Apparently they are sociopaths. From which one, the first, or the inset at the bottom? cg
|
|
|
Post by Ace on May 31, 2004 14:28:02 GMT -5
Actually from the first one. The length is pretty much the same in all three pics just lighter/darker and styled a little differently. I'm glad he has time to grow it out before his next film, and I hope he will. Ace
|
|
|
Post by curious george on May 31, 2004 14:32:18 GMT -5
I don't like it lighter. cg
|
|
|
Post by Ace on May 31, 2004 14:37:08 GMT -5
Well it's not that light, just grey at the sides (and more one side than the other). His hair can photograph lighter than it is though in some photos because light tends to reflects off the black, which is why his hair can look dark and light or even reddish or brownish in different photos during the same sequence of photos or photo shoots. That's not new.
Ace
|
|
|
Post by curious george on May 31, 2004 16:08:05 GMT -5
In the second bigger photo, to me it looks almost as if he's had it highlighted or something. He's not all that gray, is he?
cg
|
|
|
Post by Ace on May 31, 2004 19:05:44 GMT -5
Again that's just an affect of the light, on stage at the Oscars the same night it looked dark and he wasn't getting it dyed backstage. ;D Also from the red carpet: Ace
|
|
|
Post by Yuliya on Jun 1, 2004 4:20:19 GMT -5
OMG, how much Dylan has grown! In his memoirs one Russian writer said in 30-ies he had a camera with a side lens - he would look forward but see and photograph things that were to his right (or maybe it was left, I don't remember.) He wasn't a paparazzi, though; for him it was a way to take candid pictures of big city scenery. I wonder if such cameras still exist.
|
|
|
Post by Ace on Jun 1, 2004 6:38:29 GMT -5
I think that kind of camera is probably a little sophisticated for the average papparazzi, besides they don't mind being rude. Dylan is getting tall, but then tall parents- tall boy and he's 7 now. PB says he was almost 6 feet by age 11. Ace
|
|
|
Post by sparklingblue on Jun 1, 2004 11:05:36 GMT -5
Yes, very nice Pierce hair! It was one of the main reasons I posted these pictures. The other one is that the family picture is really cute, despite the paparazzi-ness. As for Keely, I think she looks almost too thin on the other photo with the red dress. But maybe that is just the photo. This one is great (and from the same article):
|
|